If the purchase is made by a registered deed of sale that includes the commodity agreement in the total cost and the costs are recorded as 70 lakhs, then the capital gains would be like what you said, that is, 1 Lakh only, but if this were not included in the deed, then the capital gains would be 16 Lakhs. …, Santacruz (West), Mumbai – 400054.3. On 14 October 2008, the parties entered into a vacation and licensing agreement and an agreement on the amenities of this function. That`s the way it is. the respondent that the equipment agreement is complementary, co-party and linked to the leave and licence agreement. It is indisputable that the duration of the agreement was 59 years. the petitioner held this position of licensee under the above-mentioned leave, licence and equipment agreement of 14 October 2008.5. On June 4, 2009, the petitioner requested. ITAT mumbai found in the above-mentioned case that the cost of acquiring a dwelling includes the cost of amenities, even if the agreement obliging the buyer to pay these fees is not registered and no stamp duty is paid on the amenity fee. You will also find other amenities known for public housing offers. Shoppers also look at the following to find out if they are buying in a particular neighborhood – schools, shopping malls, post offices, parks, playgrounds, racetracks, recreation centers, and others. .
in the case and in the law, the CIT (A) should have expected that these incomes generated under the equipment contract would be exploitable only under the heading „income from the ownership of the house“ as well as the rental income. as part of the rental agreement with the tenant for the same premises.3. The applicant therefore requests that the revenue generated under the equipment agreement be noted `Indenture of Lease` and others as `Amenities Agreement` with the lessee, HSBC Bank. In accordance with the equipment agreement, the monthly fee should be 53.16.700 / – for each of the 36 months of the. „The buyers also confirm that they will pay the balance of the agreement reached between the assignors and the developers on the January 15 amenities and that the buyers will be indestrated by the assignors against such a payment to be made by the developers contemptuous.“ the case. . . .